- 9 лет ago
- Published в: Last winner ethereum
- 2
- Автор: Brataur
To can means is on remote. Infoblox schedule next-level 57, debug some the as. Comodo Antivirus detected confirm DBeaver the is no longer but host.
BITCOIN THIEL
These mutual exchanges and co-operation must, I firmly believe, continue to strengthen. The Hong Kong Judiciary does not comprise a large number of judges I include in this term judicial officers such as magistrates. Hong Kong's judges are dedicated day in, day out to the practical implementation of the rule of law as I have described and represent the embodiment of the independence of the judiciary.
Throughout my tenure as a judge and particularly in the last ten years as Chief Justice, I can say that I remain proud of all the judges in the way they have fearlessly and without compromise upheld the law and been true to their oath. For this I am greatly indebted to them. Whether the political, social or economic atmosphere of Hong Kong has been good or not, the judges have always discharged their responsibilities consistently and conscientiously, without regard to the type or level of criticism that may be directed against them.
As we know, such criticisms can be trenchant, even to the point of being abusive on occasion, but in spite of this our judges have remained true to their calling. Sometimes, I think that courage is needed. It is comforting to know, as I believe, that the vast majority of our community has confidence in them and find reassurance in the principled way they carry out their daily work.
All this ensures stability at all times, whether good or not so good. For my part, I wish to express my deep gratitude to our judges. They have almost invariably given me their wholehearted support and have played their proper role in the administration of justice. Without this foundation, I could not have begun to discharge my own responsibilities. For the future I wish to say it is essential that the highest standards, not only of ability but also of integrity, are observed and maintained.
It is also critical that judges remain apolitical in the discharge of their duties. I hope I will be forgiven if I now single out the two levels of court I have called my professional home during my time in the Judiciary: the Court of Final Appeal and the High Court. I spent nine years in the High Court, seven of them as Chief Judge. Of the various levels in our court system, the busiest although not in terms necessarily of the number of cases handled is the High Court, certainly the most pressurised on a day to day basis.
Efficiency, teamwork, co-operation and above all dedication are pre-requisites, and these remain the characteristics of the High Court. My years in the Court of First Instance and the Court of Appeal were among the happiest in my legal career. I thank my colleagues for their support and friendship. There was more than a tinge of sadness when I left the High Court. I joined the Court of Final Appeal in September and sat in my first case a month later.
I have just two days ago presided in my last case. These past ten years have represented for me the pinnacle of my career as a lawyer. My colleagues, the Permanent Judges, have enabled me to improve as a lawyer, to think as a lawyer should and to try at all times to have the instincts of a judge to be fair and just. It has been a great honour for me to have served alongside all of you. Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury, who is on the bench today remotely , sat on his first case in this Court the same day as I did.
It was a particularly proud moment for me that I sat with him in my last appeal. I have through the years learned much from Lord Neuberger and I remain forever grateful to him for his wisdom. Sir Anthony Mason remains for me one of the wisest, ablest and best lawyers I have ever had the fortune to meet and work with. I have been much blessed in my professional life in knowing judges like Sir Anthony. Like Lord Neuberger, he is also a great supporter of Hong Kong.
Their presence on Hong Kong's highest court reflects the fact, as stipulated by the Basic Law, that Hong Kong is a common law jurisdiction and, more important, a jurisdiction that is founded on the rule of law and the independence of the judiciary.
Quite simply, their continued presence in Hong Kong is beneficial to the community. I was at my happiest working in the Judiciary when I was judging, dealing with interesting cases and learning the law along the way. Administrative duties, however, had to be performed and of course taken seriously when I became Chief Judge of the High Court and then Chief Justice. The many functions and work of the Chief Justice are not readily known, even among judges: they range from person management and discipline, through at times the making of delicate policy decisions, to dealing with the Government.
There is no handbook or guide for chief justices. This means that the support given to the Chief Justice assumes considerable importance and while it is right that I take sole responsibility for all mistakes that may have been made, I must equally acknowledge the considerable support I have received in the discharge of my administrative duties. Time does not permit me to acknowledge every person individually, but I am grateful to all of you.
I must, however, expressly thank the court leaders at each level of court - the Chief Judge of the High Court, the Chief District Judge and the Chief Magistrate, both current they are all present today and past. I also appreciate the work of all those judges who have chaired and been responsible for the various court committees. I am fully aware of the extra time they have had to spend on these committees, especially given their busy court schedules.
I must also specifically mention the Judiciary Administrator. Like the role of the Chief Justice, the function and duties of the Judiciary Administrator are not always understood or appreciated. I particularly appreciated their advice and their insistence on apprising me of all possible options to enable the best decision to be made.
Of course, it goes without saying that I am deeply grateful for the consistently excellent support I have been given by all Judiciary Administration staff. I must also mention and thank my Administrative Assistants who have likewise provided invaluable advice to me as well as considerably easing my burdens: Ms Annie Tang, Mr Esmond Lee and my present Administrative Assistant, Miss Patricia So.
I thank you all sincerely. Meticulous and fastidious, they have always provided me with sterling and always cheerful support. I mentioned earlier the fact that there is no handbook to guide a Chief Justice. What I had was better in preparing me for the responsibilities of being Chief Justice.
I was able to learn much from my predecessor, Andrew Li. They consist of environmental research and monitoring of measures of success, including mercury levels in fish, and outreach relating to mercury impacts and pollution elimination programs. Other responsibilities of this section include ensuring a sound scientific basis for state and regional environmental programs addressing toxic pollutants, development of policies and guidelines for the safe reuse of wastes that are consistent with protection of health and the environment while encouraging recycling, assessment of soil contaminants and research on environmental pollutants.
Feedback Did you find what you were looking for on this webpage? Please tell us what you were looking for. Do not include sensitive information, such as Social Security or bank account numbers. Your feedback will not receive a response.
This form only gathers feedback about the website. Thanks, your message has been sent to Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection! If you would like to continue helping us improve Mass.
Geoffrey bettinger ma difference between ltc and btc
The Honourable Chief Justice Geoffrey Ma Tao-li (3): What makes good oral advocacy?FINANZAS FOREX FORUM 2022
All this guarantees fairness and justice. The judicial oath is a solemn promise to ensure that justice is done, is seen to be done, and that nothing and no one will be allowed to influence a judge to act or compromise in any way the demands of this oath. The constitutional model mandated under the Basic Law is that of "one country, two systems".
I have always placed great emphasis on the need to have meaningful exchanges with the Mainland courts to enhance mutual understanding of the two legal systems. I have had many important exchanges over the years with successive Presidents of the Supreme People's Court, and I wish to acknowledge my gratitude to them and to the other judges of the Supreme People's Court and also to the many other Mainland judges whom I have met, for their insight and exchange of views.
These mutual exchanges and co-operation must, I firmly believe, continue to strengthen. The Hong Kong Judiciary does not comprise a large number of judges I include in this term judicial officers such as magistrates. Hong Kong's judges are dedicated day in, day out to the practical implementation of the rule of law as I have described and represent the embodiment of the independence of the judiciary.
Throughout my tenure as a judge and particularly in the last ten years as Chief Justice, I can say that I remain proud of all the judges in the way they have fearlessly and without compromise upheld the law and been true to their oath. For this I am greatly indebted to them. Whether the political, social or economic atmosphere of Hong Kong has been good or not, the judges have always discharged their responsibilities consistently and conscientiously, without regard to the type or level of criticism that may be directed against them.
As we know, such criticisms can be trenchant, even to the point of being abusive on occasion, but in spite of this our judges have remained true to their calling. Sometimes, I think that courage is needed. It is comforting to know, as I believe, that the vast majority of our community has confidence in them and find reassurance in the principled way they carry out their daily work. All this ensures stability at all times, whether good or not so good.
For my part, I wish to express my deep gratitude to our judges. They have almost invariably given me their wholehearted support and have played their proper role in the administration of justice. Without this foundation, I could not have begun to discharge my own responsibilities. For the future I wish to say it is essential that the highest standards, not only of ability but also of integrity, are observed and maintained.
It is also critical that judges remain apolitical in the discharge of their duties. I hope I will be forgiven if I now single out the two levels of court I have called my professional home during my time in the Judiciary: the Court of Final Appeal and the High Court. I spent nine years in the High Court, seven of them as Chief Judge.
Of the various levels in our court system, the busiest although not in terms necessarily of the number of cases handled is the High Court, certainly the most pressurised on a day to day basis. Efficiency, teamwork, co-operation and above all dedication are pre-requisites, and these remain the characteristics of the High Court. My years in the Court of First Instance and the Court of Appeal were among the happiest in my legal career.
I thank my colleagues for their support and friendship. There was more than a tinge of sadness when I left the High Court. I joined the Court of Final Appeal in September and sat in my first case a month later. I have just two days ago presided in my last case. These past ten years have represented for me the pinnacle of my career as a lawyer.
My colleagues, the Permanent Judges, have enabled me to improve as a lawyer, to think as a lawyer should and to try at all times to have the instincts of a judge to be fair and just. It has been a great honour for me to have served alongside all of you.
Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury, who is on the bench today remotely , sat on his first case in this Court the same day as I did. It was a particularly proud moment for me that I sat with him in my last appeal. I have through the years learned much from Lord Neuberger and I remain forever grateful to him for his wisdom. Sir Anthony Mason remains for me one of the wisest, ablest and best lawyers I have ever had the fortune to meet and work with.
I have been much blessed in my professional life in knowing judges like Sir Anthony. Like Lord Neuberger, he is also a great supporter of Hong Kong. Their presence on Hong Kong's highest court reflects the fact, as stipulated by the Basic Law, that Hong Kong is a common law jurisdiction and, more important, a jurisdiction that is founded on the rule of law and the independence of the judiciary. Quite simply, their continued presence in Hong Kong is beneficial to the community.
I was at my happiest working in the Judiciary when I was judging, dealing with interesting cases and learning the law along the way. Administrative duties, however, had to be performed and of course taken seriously when I became Chief Judge of the High Court and then Chief Justice.
The many functions and work of the Chief Justice are not readily known, even among judges: they range from person management and discipline, through at times the making of delicate policy decisions, to dealing with the Government. There is no handbook or guide for chief justices. This means that the support given to the Chief Justice assumes considerable importance and while it is right that I take sole responsibility for all mistakes that may have been made, I must equally acknowledge the considerable support I have received in the discharge of my administrative duties.
Time does not permit me to acknowledge every person individually, but I am grateful to all of you. I must, however, expressly thank the court leaders at each level of court - the Chief Judge of the High Court, the Chief District Judge and the Chief Magistrate, both current they are all present today and past.
I also appreciate the work of all those judges who have chaired and been responsible for the various court committees. I am fully aware of the extra time they have had to spend on these committees, especially given their busy court schedules. I must also specifically mention the Judiciary Administrator. Like the role of the Chief Justice, the function and duties of the Judiciary Administrator are not always understood or appreciated.
I particularly appreciated their advice and their insistence on apprising me of all possible options to enable the best decision to be made. Of course, it goes without saying that I am deeply grateful for the consistently excellent support I have been given by all Judiciary Administration staff.
I must also mention and thank my Administrative Assistants who have likewise provided invaluable advice to me as well as considerably easing my burdens: Ms Annie Tang, Mr Esmond Lee and my present Administrative Assistant, Miss Patricia So. ORS also develops new methods and conducts environmental research on priority pollutants. Staff lead new initiatives to better characterize exposures and resultant health risks from chemical exposures e.
Research on fish tissue mercury issues is also conducted by this group. Areas of specialization are toxicity assessment, exposure evaluation, and risk characterization for human health risk assessment for waste sites and landfills. Additional areas of expertise include ecological risk assessment at waste sites and landfills, environmental standards, environmental sampling and analysis practices, evaluation of background conditions, statistical analysis, and uncertainty evaluation.
Ongoing projects consist of updating human health risk assessment and ecological risk assessment guidance, developing MCP Method 1 Standards for soil and groundwater, developing Shortform spreadsheets to streamline MCP Method 3 site-specific human health risk assessment; and evaluating various existing and proposed Waste Site Cleanup policies.
These comprehensive initiatives encompass policies, regulations, and source emission inventories. They consist of environmental research and monitoring of measures of success, including mercury levels in fish, and outreach relating to mercury impacts and pollution elimination programs. Other responsibilities of this section include ensuring a sound scientific basis for state and regional environmental programs addressing toxic pollutants, development of policies and guidelines for the safe reuse of wastes that are consistent with protection of health and the environment while encouraging recycling, assessment of soil contaminants and research on environmental pollutants.
Geoffrey bettinger ma does exodus support ethereum alts
Chief Justice Geoffrey Ma - Full Q\u0026A - Oxford Union Web Series
2 комментарии на “Geoffrey bettinger ma”
buy bitcoins credit card canada
wawrinka vs federer betting expert boxing